Substantial Abuse issues
The United States Trustee's office oversees all consumer bankruptcy filings. In the past year or two, they have become more visible and active. The main reason for this is the change in the law that occurred in October 2005. Now, the Trustee audits a certain number of cases in an attempt to make sure that debtors' and their attorneys are properly listing assets and debts and to ensure that they are following the Bankruptcy Code. One of the issues that is gaining popularity with the Trustee's office is that of Substantial Abuse.
Even before the change in the law, substantial abuse was an issue. However, it is now becoming more popular as a means for the Trustee to either have Chapter 7 cases dismissed or converted to Chapter 13 cases. Basically, the Trustee looks at the "totality of the debtor's circumstances" in Chapter 7 cases. The Trustee is looking at the debtors' income and listed expenses to see if they find anything "unusual." I put the term "unusual" in quotes because, as far as I can tell, there are no standards that the Trustee uses to determine what expenses might be too high. Interestingly, the IRS publishes standards that the Trustee has adopted for use in the Means Test. However, in substantial abuse cases these standards are apparently not followed!
The purpose of the review is to see if some expenses are exaggerated or non-existent. If the Trustee can reduce some "unusual" expenses or refute the existence of some expenses, there may be enough income to pay unsecured creditors' claims. If that happens, the Trustee will file a Motion to Dismiss the Chapter 7 based on substantial abuse. In other words, if your budget is not accurate or lists some expenses that the Trustee deems "unusual", you may face a Motion to Dismiss your case unless you agree to convert your case to a Chapter 13 where you pay some of the unsecured debts back over a 3 to 5 year period. Recent caselaw shows that the ability to repay less than 25% of unsecured debt over a 5 year period is NOT substantial abuse. This law is constantly developing and changing.
Recently, I had the Trustee file a Motion based on substantial abuse where my clients could not produce evidence that they really spent $175 per month on diapers for 2 infants or that they actually spent $400 on groceries a month or $200 per month on clothing. The Trustee wanted to reduce those figures to what we could actually prove with checking account statements and cancelled checks. The Trustee claimed that some of these expenses were unusually high for a family of 4. The Trustee could not show any standard upon which they relied. They intended to go to the hearing with one of their accountants who would testify that she thought that the listed amounts were simply too much and the amounts were not supported by any receipts. Interestingly, the numbers used in the debtors' budget were significantly less than those used by the same Trustee based on figures from the IRS!
That case is still pending and I will update you on its outcome. In the meantime, it might be a good idea to keep receipts, even for standard things like groceries. I expect the Trustee's office will get more aggressive on this issue in the near future. If you can prove that your budget figures are completely accurate, you should do fine. If not, prepare to go to Court.
Even before the change in the law, substantial abuse was an issue. However, it is now becoming more popular as a means for the Trustee to either have Chapter 7 cases dismissed or converted to Chapter 13 cases. Basically, the Trustee looks at the "totality of the debtor's circumstances" in Chapter 7 cases. The Trustee is looking at the debtors' income and listed expenses to see if they find anything "unusual." I put the term "unusual" in quotes because, as far as I can tell, there are no standards that the Trustee uses to determine what expenses might be too high. Interestingly, the IRS publishes standards that the Trustee has adopted for use in the Means Test. However, in substantial abuse cases these standards are apparently not followed!
The purpose of the review is to see if some expenses are exaggerated or non-existent. If the Trustee can reduce some "unusual" expenses or refute the existence of some expenses, there may be enough income to pay unsecured creditors' claims. If that happens, the Trustee will file a Motion to Dismiss the Chapter 7 based on substantial abuse. In other words, if your budget is not accurate or lists some expenses that the Trustee deems "unusual", you may face a Motion to Dismiss your case unless you agree to convert your case to a Chapter 13 where you pay some of the unsecured debts back over a 3 to 5 year period. Recent caselaw shows that the ability to repay less than 25% of unsecured debt over a 5 year period is NOT substantial abuse. This law is constantly developing and changing.
Recently, I had the Trustee file a Motion based on substantial abuse where my clients could not produce evidence that they really spent $175 per month on diapers for 2 infants or that they actually spent $400 on groceries a month or $200 per month on clothing. The Trustee wanted to reduce those figures to what we could actually prove with checking account statements and cancelled checks. The Trustee claimed that some of these expenses were unusually high for a family of 4. The Trustee could not show any standard upon which they relied. They intended to go to the hearing with one of their accountants who would testify that she thought that the listed amounts were simply too much and the amounts were not supported by any receipts. Interestingly, the numbers used in the debtors' budget were significantly less than those used by the same Trustee based on figures from the IRS!
That case is still pending and I will update you on its outcome. In the meantime, it might be a good idea to keep receipts, even for standard things like groceries. I expect the Trustee's office will get more aggressive on this issue in the near future. If you can prove that your budget figures are completely accurate, you should do fine. If not, prepare to go to Court.
